Sunday, July 8, 2012


So What If I Told You I Can Mathematically Prove The


Universe Was Created In Just Six Days... and Billions of Years?






The oldest recorded account of the beginning/creation of the universe is in the first chapter of the Old Testament/Torah......Genesis. 
In Genesis, it is written that Yahuweh created everything in six days. It seems that most people believe that is scientifically impossible.
So what if I told you that I can mathematically prove the universe was created in six days; just as it is written in the Genesis acccount?
Read on!

Yahweh’s open letter to mankind began: “In (near, with, and in proximity to, regarding the account of) the beginning (at the start of time and the initiation of the process of existence, concerning first fruits and the head of the family), God (the Mighty One) accordingly created (performed a miracle, choosing perfect transformation and renewed birth, conceived, planned, prepared, and produced) the universe, the spiritual world (the heavens and the abode of stars) and also the material realm (matter, the physical and natural world). The material realm (the natural substance of which the universe is comprised, matter) exists formless, as an orderless and empty void, obscured in darkness along with (beside and together with) the presence of the inaccessible and mysterious depths (the abyss or lightless places). And the Spirit (ruwach) of God (‘elohym) washed, purified, and hovered over (quickly and rapidly moved) in accordance with (upon, concerning, beside, on behalf of, on account of, and together with) the presence of water.

“God said, ‘Let there be
(exist) light, and light existed. God saw (perceived and regarded, appeared and presented Himself, became visible, found delight in, and distinguished that) the light was good (pleasant, cheerful, and agreeable; of a higher nature; beautiful, valuable, beneficial and prosperous). And God separated (divided and set apart) light from darkness (obscurity, that which shrouds in blackness, veils by withholding knowledge, imperfects and clouds revelation with ominous and sinister suggestions, concealing and mystifying by way of ignorance and confusion).” (Genesis 1:1-4) 


God’s creative testimony was accurate when He revealed that cosmologically, time began the moment energy became matter. Before the conversion of energy to matter, time did not, and could not, exist. In fact, Yahweh’s suggestion that the “material realm was formless and orderless” initially, syncs with current scientific thought, whereby matter is considered to be nothing more than an organized form of energy.

Also noteworthy, the Genesis account indicates that before Yahweh created the light energy which became the cosmos, there was a lifeless, purposeless, void. Scientists are in lock-step, confirming that before the Big Bang, there were no physical laws, no matter, or life—only a powerful source of energy. Furthermore, we now know that the inception of the universe was incredibly chaotic. In the beginning, light was literally separated from darkness. Photons broke free as electrons were liberated. But even today light remains supreme; there are a billion photons in the universe for every particle of matter. God’s testimony, “Let there be light and there was light” is consistent with our observable reality.

According to scientists, the universe began fifteen billion years ago (plus or minus two billion years) from our perspective on earth looking back, and it was spawned just six days ago from the perspective of the Creator at the time and place of creation according to His Genesis testimony. Both suggest that the first universal epoch, that of initial galactic formation, lasted seven to eight billion years from our vantage point, which is one twenty-four-hour day measured from the relative position of creation, looking forward. So how is that possible, you may be wondering?

Light, the subject of the first day, is the eternal timekeeper. Its wave aspect allows man to measure time anywhere, even near the place where time began. But to appreciate this we must first understand what time is. And for that, the best place to turn is to Albert Einstein. He brought forth the Theory of General Relativity which establishes the relationship between light, mass, energy, space, and time. He was the first to discover that the rate at which time passes is not the same at all places. Differences in mass and velocity radically affect the rate at which time flows. This aspect of the General Theory of Relativity has been so thoroughly verified that it is considered to be an established physical law. The only aspects of relativity in dispute are those related to quantum mechanics—to the lack of cause and effect, even certainty, at the subatomic level, and whether gravity is a force or an effect (of the bending the fabric of space-time). But when it comes to the realization that time is a dimension, not a constant, and that its rate of flow is relative, there is no dispute.

The pace of time at a location with greater mass, energy, or velocity is slower than at a place with diminished mass, energy, or velocity. We can confirm this shift by measuring the two parts per million a light wave is stretched emanating in the presence of the greater mass of the sun relative to a light wave generated on earth. The sun’s clock runs 2.12/1,000,000 slower than earth’s, losing 67 seconds a year relative to a terrestrial timepiece. But the sun is only marginally more massive than the earth, especially compared to creation—to the concentration of energy and mass required to create 10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 suns (100 billion galaxies each averaging 100 billion stars). And that’s just the known universe, representing a scant four percent of the total (96% of the energy and mass in the cosmos is considered “dark” because its nature is unknown to us).

Fortunately, we don’t have to guess the rate time flowed in these conditions. The measurement is screaming out to us in one form, it is observable in a second medium, it is calculable in a third, and the rate is deducible in a fourth venue. The pace time flowed at creation cries out from the entire universe in photon radiation in the form of cosmic microwave background (CMB)—an elongated part of the electromagnetic spectrum. The CMB is a measure of the residual heat left over from the time photons were first freed to travel—about 300,000 years after the Big Bang. Discovered at the Bell Labs by Robert Wilson and Arno Penzias in 1965, cosmic microwave background radiation is the residue of the aftermath of creation, and thus provides us with a cosmic clock calibrated to a time close to the first day of Genesis. The CMB wavelength is stretched approximately one million million fold, suggesting that genesis time flowed slower by a factor of 1012. More on this in a moment...

A second glimpse of the Creator’s clock can be gleaned by observing the red shift, or lengthening of wavelengths emitted from the oldest and most distant sources of light and comparing this expansion to the rate the universe has and is growing. To understand this, we turn to professor Peebles who was named the Albert Einstein Professor of Science at Princeton University. In his textbook, The Principles of Physical Cosmology (Princeton University Press), Philip Peebles, who has established himself as the world’s foremost authority on cosmology, explains that when the universe was small, it was doubling very rapidly. But as the cosmos grew, the time required to double in size got exponentially longer. He, concurring with most all cosmological texts, quotes 1012 as the average rate of expansion. This yields a general relationship between genesis time and time today, indicating that they are different by a factor of one million million.

This concept is fairly simple: when space was stretched, so were the wavelengths within it. The red shift, or stretching due to the expansion of space, is commonly observed in astronomical data, and it now confirms that time originally flowed a trillion times slower than it does today.

The calculable, and third, insight into creation’s clock, and how it differs from ours today, is found by dividing the temperature of quark confinement, when light energy could be successfully transformed into matter (10.9 x 1012 Kelvin) following the Big Bang, by today’s universal temperature of 2.73 degrees Kelvin (the measure of the CMB). This ratio enables us to compare the amount of energy concentrated near the point of creation with that which currently exists. This is relevant because, the more energy which is present, the slower time moves. The resulting calculation serves to confirm that our clock runs 0.399 x 1012 (399,000,000,000) faster than the Creator’s clock at the genesis.

To bring this all together, I am going to refer to, and on occasion paraphrase, a work called The Science of God by Gerald Schroeder, a man with doctoral degrees in nuclear physics and earth science from M.I.T. His book serves to present relativity, quantum mechanics, biology, and probability in simple, easy to understand terms. He not only deduced a similar exponential, he was the first to compare creation’s clock to the Genesis account. His reasoning can be summarized as follows: the wavelength of what we now observe as cosmic microwave background radiation was stretched during the inflationary period, at the outset of time, in the first seconds of the first day. At creation, energy transitioned into matter consistent with Einstein’s E = mc2, with c being the speed of light multiplied by itself, requiring an enormous amount of energy to form a relatively tiny accumulation of matter. This initial transition from energy to substance occurred when the universe was a million-million times smaller and hotter than it is today. We know that this is the point when time began because time only takes hold when matter forms. From the relative perspective of photon/wave energy, time literally stands still.

The MIT-trained nuclear physicist went on to say that according to the measurements taken in the most advanced physics laboratories, the temperature, and thus frequency, of radiation at the instant of creation was 1012 times hotter than the 2.73o K we now observe in the black of space. Since the Big Bang temperatures were a trillion times hotter, or more energy-intense than today’s observed CMB, it means that the electromagnetic wavelength must have been a trillion times shorter than it is now at its present trillion-times-lower temperature.

The higher the temperature, the higher the frequency of the wave, and the higher the frequency, the shorter the wavelength must be. Girded with this knowledge, we can use recent nuclear laboratory calculations to deduce that the CBM is stretched by a factor of approximately 1012, or 1,000,000,000,000 to one—slowing the cosmic clock at creation relative to earth by that amount.

Therefore on average, these four measurements serve to confirm that one day in the Creator’s life at creation would seem like 0.9 x 1012 days to us. And none of this should be surprising since Yahweh consistently equates His nature to light, and since we now know that at the velocity of light, time stands still. Eternity only exists in the presence of the Light.

Before we examine the calculations calibrating genesis time to our own to ascertain how God and man can both be accurate and yet differ, let’s take a moment to explore some of the cosmological assumptions which have led us to our current state of awareness. To begin, cosmologists contend that a concentration of energy at the initiation of the universe produced electromagnetic waves, or photons, that were forged as the explosion cooled sufficiently to permit matter to form. Persisting to this day, the photons have traveled out in all directions. The thermal soup of quarks, electrons, and photons decreased in temperature rapidly, falling from 1013 degrees Kelvin to one billion degrees after the first few minutes (a temperature still 67 times hotter than the sun’s core). Three hundred thousand years later, as universal energy and density dispersed and dissipated, atoms began to coalesce into gas clouds which later evolved into stars. Moving forward to today we find that the black body temperature of space has fallen to 2.73 Kelvin—hovering ever so slightly above absolute zero. This temperature is the remnant of the primordial fireball which is discernable through the stretching of the electromagnetic wavelength.

Visible light lies in the center of the nearly infinite range of electromagnetic waves, also known as traveling packets of energy. This physical phenomenon occurs when an electric field couples with a perpendicular magnetic field. Lengths and frequencies of photon energy vary, but not speeds, at least in a vacuum. All forms of radiant energy, gamma rays, x-rays, ultraviolet, visible light, infrared, microwave and radio waves, are manifestations of the same thing and they all travel at the same speed—a pace so extreme that from their perspective, time slows to the point that it no longer moves.

The wavelength of the electromagnetic radiation determines whether it falls within our range of vision. We see wavelengths of approximately 0.00007 centimeters as red and 0.00004 cm as violet at the other extreme of the visible spectrum. By contrast, a microwave produces waves that are 10.0 cm long, while gamma rays from radioactive materials can be as short as 0.000000001 cm. The shorter the wavelength, the higher the wave frequency and energy. A gamma-ray photon, for example, packs billions of times more energy than an infra-red photon. This is important because the energy we measure as CMB was emitted as gamma rays (10-11 cm), but are now elongated microwaves (10 cm), indicating that they have stretched a million million fold—confirming our 1012 exponential once again.

As an interesting aside, while we can only feel infrared light and see visible light I believe that our senses will be more receptive in our eternal state. We may be able to see and feel things that currently lay well beyond our current limitations. To quote Scripture, “For now we see in a mirror dimly, but then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part, but then I shall know fully just as I have been fully known.” (1 Corinthians 13:12) What I’m hinting at here is that I think the universe may be comprised of seven dimensions, not just the four we vaguely perceive today, and that dark matter and energy are essential components of these things.

Once we recognize that the CMB is little more than a uniform sea of photons left over from the hot early phase of the universe immediately after quark confinement, we are confronted with a singular plausible explanation for having this uniform CMB radiation exist throughout the universe with such a precise spectrum. It had to be generated at a time when the cosmos was much hotter and denser than it is now. Hence the CMB spectrum is essentially incontrovertible evidence that the universe experienced a hot Big Bang stage (that’s not to say that we understand the initial instant, just that we know the universe used to be vastly more energy intense and massively dense—expanding, becoming less dense, and cooling ever since).

It is therefore certain, that the early universe was very hot. The temperature was approximately 4 × 1072 ergs. An erg is a unit of energy equivalent to 10-7 joules, the energy required to exert a force of one newton a distance of one meter. This means that creation was 1012 times hotter than the universe is today on average.

There was so much energy around at the time, scientists speculate that pairs of particles and anti-particles were continually being created and annihilated. This annihilation was translated into packets of light, known as photons. But as the universe expanded and the temperature fell, particles and anti-particles (quarks and the like) annihilated each other for the last time, and the energies became low enough that they couldn’t be recreated again. For reasons still not understood today, the early cosmos had about one part in a billion more particles than anti-particles. So when all the anti-particles had annihilated their counterparts, that left about a billion photons for every particle of matter. And that’s the way the universe exists today, with light remaining dominant.

Now that we have some familiarity with the elements which comprise the coefficient of variance between our clock and the Creator’s, let’s examine how long this timepiece has been running. Here, Hubble’s law has great significance because it quantifies the expansion of the universe and thus can be used to calculate its age. The time elapsed since the Big Bang is a function of the present value of Hubble’s constant and its rate of change. Astronomers have determined the approximate rate of expansion, but no one has yet been able to measure the second value precisely. Still, one can estimate rate of change within the context of the universe’s average density. Since gravity exerts a force which opposes expansion, galaxies should be moving apart more slowly now than they did in the past. The rate of change in expansion is therefore related to the gravitational pull of the universe as a result of its average density. If the density is that of the visible material in and around galaxies, the age of the universe is between 12 and 18 billion years—a range which allows for the uncertainty in the rate of expansion.

The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe recently provided an estimate of 13.7 billion years. That is a bit suspicious for two reasons. First, the density of the universe isn’t remotely equivalent to “the visible material in and around galaxies.” Along these lines, this very same satellite confirmed that 96% of the energy/matter in the cosmos is unknown to us. This gravitationally repulsive dark energy has dramatic consequences for all aspects of fundamental physics, so it should have moved the age estimate to one outside of that anticipated by Hubble (12 to 18 billion years). Further, the universe is filled with a uniform sea of quantum zero-point energy, or a condensate of new particles that have a mass which is 10-39 times smaller than that of an electron. They should not be ignored.

The second reason for skepticism is that the cosmos cannot be younger than the material from which it is comprised. There is considerable evidence that many stars, even relatively close ones, are considerably older than 13.7 billion years. Many are considered to be more than 15 billion years old.

Apart from the Hubble red shift expansion model, and the Wilkinson CMB estimates, there are several other ways to evaluate the universe’s age. For example, the rate of cooling of white dwarf stars indicates the oldest stars in the disk of the Milky Way galaxy are about 9 billion years old. The stars in the halo of the Milky Way are somewhat older, about 15 billion years—a value derived from the rate of nuclear fuel consumption in their cores.

Additionally, the ages of the oldest known chemical elements in the cosmos are also approximately 15 billion years old according to radioactive dating techniques. Workers in laboratories have derived these age estimates from atomic and nuclear physics. It is noteworthy that their results agree with the age astronomers have derived by measuring cosmic expansion.

Now that we have evaluated some of the pieces to our puzzle—God’s big bang testimony, man’s Big Bang Theory, the age of the universe, the relative nature of time, and the role of photon energy in our genesis—it’s time to put it all together. The first conclusion should now be obvious. This discussion on the initiation of time, concentration of energy, inflationary stretching of space, and the transformation of light into matter, serves to corroborate Yahweh’s testimony. The Big Bang theory requires, and our observations confirm, that all of these things actually occurred during the cosmos’ birth. It is why Genesis 1:2 says the ruwach/Spirit of ‘elohiym/the Mighty One was paney/present rachaph/hovering over the tohu, bohu, and chosek—the lifeless, formless, void of darkness prior to the existence of visible ‘owr/light. And especially notable in this context is that one of rachaph’s most prevalent connotations is “agitation and rapid movement,” making everything God has said thus far consistent with the evidence. The second conclusion should now be intuitive. Based upon our analysis of the cosmic clock, Yahweh’s claim that the first universal epoch lasted one day is not in conflict with the scientific assertion that it required 7 to 8 billion years. 

In support of this conclusion, consider the fact that while the various scientific methods for estimating of the age of our universe provide differing conclusions, they all fall within the same general magnitude. So while we cannot be dogmatic or assert that the scientific claims are precise, based upon our ability to measure it, looking back in time from the vantage point of earth, the universe can be reasonably assumed to be 15 billion years old plus or minus a billion years or so.

The creative days of Genesis, however, look forward, not back. Yahweh’s testimony was composed as an eyewitness, from the perspective of the Creator at creation, not from that of us on earth. The simple truth is that no matter how arrogant and self-reliant mankind chooses to be, our planet didn’t exist when the universe was formed, so our perspective and clock could not have been used.

With that in mind, let’s compare our clock to His. To do that we must multiply the 15,000,000,000 year estimated age of the cosmos by 365.25 days per year so that both clocks conform to the same unit of measure—that being “days.” 15,000,000,000 years x 365.25 days/year = 5,478,750,000,000 days (plus or minus 10%).

To coordinate this 5.5 trillion day period with creation’s clock, respecting the relativistic nature of time, we must divide this number of earth days since creation by the coefficient time was slowed at creation. Earlier, we deduced this number by averaging the results derived from the four methods from which it can be calculated. We discovered that Big Bang time ran 0.9 x 1012 (900,000,000,000) times slower than earth time does today.

So here is the math: 5,478,750,000,000 days (plus or minus 10%) divided by 900,000,000,000 equals: 6 days. From the vantage point of a witness to creation, existing at the point of inception, the whole process from start to finish took a length of time that equates to six, twenty-four hour, earth days.

“And thus the heavens and earth were finished...and on the seventh day God ended His work which He had made...” (Genesis 2:1-2) 

This is not a cosmic coincidence. Yahweh’s timeline, His accounting, God’s 3,000-year-old written testimony, corresponds precisely with the evidence at our disposal. If that doesn’t get your attention and cause you to think that His Scriptures might be inspired, nothing will.

But we have only scratched the surface. With every layer and detail He adds, God proves that He knew how the universe was created, when it was created, and how and when life came to exist—because He was responsible. This then compels a singular informed and rational verdict: “In the beginning God created the universe, the spiritual world and also the material realm.”

The material realm (‘erets - the natural material of which the universe is comprised) exists (hayah) formless (tohu), as an orderless and empty void (bohu), obscured in darkness (chosek) along with (‘al - beside and together with) the presence (paniym) of the inaccessible and mysterious depths (tehowm - the abyss).” (Genesis 1:2) 
There is a hint of science here. Tahowm is derived from huwm, meaning “great movement and noise.” Its most direct definition is “great explosion” or “big bang.” So, by using the term “Big Bang,” mankind’s most acclaimed competitive alternative to Genesis One, Yahweh is demonstrating that He has a sense of humor.

Monday, February 27, 2012

Scriptural Reasons That I Do NOT Believe In Pre-Tribulation Rapture


REASONS FOR NO PRE-TRIBULATION RAPTURE --- SCRIPTURAL
First of all, let's get to Jude 1:14-16. In this passage, Jude quotes from the apocryphal Book of Enoch. Although this book was not included in the canon of Scripture, early church historians wrote that the church accepted it as a valid source of information. Therefore, it is plausible to conclude that Jude, writing under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, used this prophecy of Enoch as a means of describing those false teachers who sought to lead astray believers from the true faith in Christ. For some time this passage was the chief reason for the Book of Jude's rejection form the canon of Scripture. However, by 400 AD, Jude's letter had been fully accepted by the entire church.
ALSO, the LANGUAGE of the NEW TESTAMENT was GREEK, NOT HEBREW. We do NOT HAVE the New Testament in anything but ancient GREEK. HEBREW/ARAMAIC was OLD TESTAMENT.

Now let's look at the book of Matthew.  Chapter 24:15-28 discuss the Great Tribulation, up to the point where it tells us to be ready for Christ's return. And a reminder - these are Christ's words! Matthew 24:29 - "IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE TRIBULATION OF THOSE DAYS shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: And THEN SHALL APPEAR the sign of the Son of man in heaven and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. And he shall send his angels with a great sound of a trumpet, and THEY SHALL GATHER TOGETHER HIS ELECT FROM THE FOUR WINDS, from one end of heaven to the other.

Now, let's look at MARK. ALSO Christ's words! Chapter 13. 3-13 talks about forthcoming woes. This is just before the great tribulation. 13:13 And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that shall endure unto the END, the same SHALL BE SAVED.
13:14 - 23 - The Great Tribulation. Specifically let's look at Verses 19-20: For IN those days shall be affliction, such as was not from the beginning of the creation which God created unto this time, neither shall be. (20) And except that the Lord had shortened those days, no flesh should be saved: BUT FOR THE ELECT'S SAKE, WHOM HE HATH CHOSEN, HE HATH SHORTENED THE DAYS.
Now, 13:24-27 - Christ Is Coming Again! Let's read.... 13:24 But in those days, AFTER THAT TRIBULATION, the sun shall be darkened and the moon shall not give her light, And the stars of heaven shall fall, and the powers that are in heaven shall be shaken. AND THEN SHALL THEY SEE THE SON OF MAN COMING IN THE CLOUDS WITH GREAT POWER AND GLORY, AND THEN SHALL HE SEND HIS ANGELS, AND SHALL GATHER TOGETHER HIS ELECT FROM THE FOUR WINDS, FROM THE UTTERMOST PART OF THE EARTH TO THE UTTERMOST PART OF HEAVEN.

Even in Luke 21:32-33, after He has told the apostles how to "tell time", He says, "Verily I say unto you, This generation shall not pass away, till all be fulfilled. Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away."

What is "this generation"? The generation which lives after Jerusalem becomes a nation again. That happened in 1948.

He also says that it will be as was in the days of Noah. This refers back to "one shall be taken and the other left." Christ says in Luke 17:32 - Remember Lot's wife. Just before that he says that when the Son of man is revealed, if a man is on a housetop and his belongings are in the house, let him NOT come down to take it away, and he that is in the field, let him likewise not return back. Remember Lot's wife. Because in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken and the other shall be left. The WORD that was used in the ORIGINAL GREEK that was interpreted as SHALL BE TAKEN is "paralambano" (par-a-lam-BAN-o). This word means "to receive near; to associate oneself with; to assume an office; to learn". There will be a giving of knowledge and a bringing together (an association) among the saved, and we are to take it and not look back, lest we be like Lot's wife (turned into a pillar of salt) or like those in the days of Noah (being told the truth but refusing to hear it). It is this "TAKING" that establishes the ELECT which will be TAKEN at the ONE and ONLY RETURN OF CHRIST!

Why is it important that Christ said in Luke 21:33, "Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away"? Because of Revelation 21:1. "And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea." The word "new" is a translation of the Greek word "kainon" which means "qualitatively new", not "literally new". Many scholars believe the meaning is that Heaven and Earth will be as this heaven and this earth were at their creation.

Do we need to go ON? Jesus HIMSELF TELLS US THAT THE TRIBULATION COMES FIRST, FOLLOWED BY HIS RETURN! Who are His elect?

Determining who God's elect are is very important. This is urgently important because it is they who are the saved (Mk. 13:27). God knows who is elect are. "... God hath from the beginning chosen you to salvation," Paul writes, "through sanctification of the Spirit and belief of the truth" (2 Thes. 2:13, cf. 1 Pet. 1:2).

The elect or chosen of God are those who have believed the truth. It is "in" or "by" belief of the truth that the elect are chosen or become the elect (2 Thes. 2:13). Who says truth does not matter? Jesus is the truth or presented the truth (John 14:6). His words, truth, are spirit and life (John 6:63). We are free of the bondage of sin by believing the truth (John 8:32). We purify our souls in obeying the truth (1 Pet. 1:22), and we are to worship God in spirit and in truth (John 4:24). The truth is the word of God, the one faith (Eph. 4:5). It is that system to which many rendered obedience (Acts 6:7, 13:8), and the faith has been once for all delivered (Jude 3).

The elect are those who have been set apart by the spirit. This is precisely what Paul said regarding the saved at Thessalonica (2Thes. 2:13). The Spirit sets apart or sanctifies through the truth (John 17:17). As we submit to the Spirit's teaching regarding belief, repentance, confession, baptism for the remission of sin, and growth, we are sanctified (John 8:24, Acts 17:31, Rom. 10:10, Acts 2:38, Col. 1:10).

To the elect God multiples grace and peace (1 Pet. 1:2).

I do not speak from false doctrines. If they are false, they are no more false than any other; but the doctrines of this church (Greek Orthodox) date literally to the days of the apostles. Religion is NOT dead; Religion is corrupt. Religion is the study of God's word with divinely qualified leaders, it is the worship of God according to His laws, it is the keeping His Holy days Holy. No, we are Laodecia- the lukewarm. We don't like it? Make something else fit! We don't like it? Say then that religion is dead! No, the desire for God within the soul of man is what is dead. The desire for the TRUTH OF HIS WORD!

Who or What Is The Enemy Of Our God, Anyway?


Okay, I think the file I am looking for is on my "big" computer, and I'm on the laptop. I will give the best explanation I can here.

The original use of the word satan came in later transcriptions of ancient texts. The word itself means "adversary". The OLDEST name found for satan (this is why you will never find me capitalizing satan - the better interpretation would have been "the satan) is a name that is rarely heard and I would rather not give it out. However, in discussing this with a friend of mine who has been studying ancient Hebrew and the older scrolls, I will share what he told me regarding the name (except for the name).

//The Adversary has a name. It is only found once in the Tanakh. We learned it from the great YashaYahu (Isaiah) Scroll that was recovered in the Qumran excavation site, back in the late 40's.
I've been studying the Dead Sea Scrolls for a while now. I hate to even type his name, but since nobody here knows it, I suppose I could do it for educational purposes. His name is (omission deliberate). It means arrogant son of the morning star. (the sun)
That's straight from the "original Hebrew texts". :-)
The DSS predate the oldest copies of the Masoretic texts by centuries and centuries.//

Okay, so we know the following:

~The Hebrew noun satan, (sah-TAHN), transliterated (not translated) “satan,” means “adversary.” It occurs nine times in the Old Testament and generally has the meaning “adversary” or ”an adversary.”
~Without the definite article, and meaning “Satan,” the word occurs only in I Chronicles 21:1. Some prefer to see it even here as “an adversary,” not necessarily an actual being as being Satan.
~With the definite article, “the satan” (hassatan) means “the adversary.” It occurs seven times in Job 1:6-9, 12, seven times in Job 2:1-7, three times in Zechariah 3:1-2, and nowhere else in the Old Testament. Most Christian and Jewish interpreters have understood this title as “The Adversary,” i.e., Satan.

Also, satan was a cherub, the highest rank of angels. We find this in Ezekiel. Many say that Ezekiel 11 is speaking only of the King of Tyre. No - it is, as other chapters in other areas of the Bible do, speaking of both man and satan at the same time (it usually starts as one and transfers over to the other). If this was talking about the King of Tyre, when was HE in God's garden of Eden? He wasn't.

Ezekiel 28
13Thou hast been in Eden the garden of God; every precious stone was thy covering, the sardius, topaz, and the diamond, the beryl, the onyx, and the jasper, the sapphire, the emerald, and the carbuncle, and gold: the workmanship of thy tabrets and of thy pipes was prepared in thee in the day that thou wast created.

14Thou art the anointed cherub that covereth; and I have set thee so: thou wast upon the holy mountain of God; thou hast walked up and down in the midst of the stones of fire.

WHEN was the King of Tyre on the "mountain of God" and "walking in the middle of the stones of fire"? WHEN was the king of Tyre ever considered a CHERUB? The bible often speaks with a duality when prophesying. The typology here refers to both in various ways, King of Tyre (probably possessed by Satan as in the end time Beast) and Lucifer apart from the King of Tyre.

We know that the garden of Eden was a pattern of the heavenly temple; just as the tabernacle of Moses was. Satan was in the garden of God in Heaven (as well as in the earth), just as Adam was in the earthly type of the heavenly garden. Just as Adam and Eve were cast out of the earthly Eden when iniquity was found in them so was Lucifer cast out of the Eden of Heaven when iniquity was discovered in him.

Was satan a literal snake and not a cherub? Well, was Judah a lion? Was Herod a fox? No. The bible uses much symbolism.

Now, back to the name. So WHERE did "Lucifer" come from? Well, it came from changes in interpretation over time. Jerome (or St. Jerome for those of you who are Catholic), was the the one who was chosen to translate the Bible from Original Hebrew/Aramaic and Greek texts to Latin. Once the first church/religion split in Constantinople, and you had Eastern (Orthodox) and Western (Catholic), Rome wanted a Latin translation. This takes us to Isaiah 14 and the King of Babylon (another duality story like the King of Tyre, where both man and satan are being talked about).

You see, instead of "the morning star", the ancient texts (upon studying the dead sea scrolls") tells us that the actual name should have been "arrogant son of the morning star". Therein lies the first problem and point of confusion. When Jerome translated "morning star", he translated "lucern ferre" -- the Latin words meaning "light bearer". This of course makes no sense when talking about the adversary, and it shouldn't - as he was the "arrogant son of the morning star". But that is what we had at that time, the Dead Sea Scrolls had not been discovered (and still no changes have been made based on their discovery). So, lucern ferre, or "light bearer" it was. Over time and more translations, "lucern ferre" became "lucernferre", became "lucerfer", became "Lucifer". THAT is where the name came from.

Being Greek Orthodox, and knowing that even the Greek Orthodox Church cannot agree on an accurate interpretation from ancient Greek to modern Greek, I know how sensitive God's word is to misinterpretation due to translational error. Even our KJV holds changes, and that is why I encourage people to get a "Key Word" Bible, which will enable you to choose just about any word as you read (KJV) and look in the back for the original word in Hebrew or Greek and what its original meaning is. It can be very enlightening.

I hope this helped clarify what was also for me a point of great question (obviously!). Any disagreements with what I've found in my studies, please let me know. I am by no means perfect -- I'm just like the rest of you - seeking the core truth of God's Holy Word. :)